Below is an extract from a recent post on my
Aquapoetics: Creative Aquatic Bodywork blog. It is also a call for input and thoughts from those of you who practice alternative aquatics. I am gathering data for an upcoming presentation. Click on the title below to go to the full article. Comments there or here would be very much appreciated and valued. Thank you, Sulis
Do you keep records of your alternative aquatics* sessions?
* Is there any value in documenting anecdotal results obtained in aquatic practices such as those offered in alternative health and spa settings?
* If these practices do not fit current scientific-medical models does that mean they are not valid as therapeutic modalities?
* What aspects of these so-called alternative practices might warrant further study?
* Could we develop an appropriate framework for documentation and research into alternative aquatics?
These are some of the questions I have often asked myself since I discovered aquatic bodywork, beginning with Watsu, and found that my previous scientific background did not explain or prepare me for much of what I have experienced through this work over the last decade. It is an area that I believe remains largely unexplored, at least in any kind of collaborative way across a spectrum of alternative aquatics practitioners.
The article that follows was prepared for a clinical aquatics audience. These practitioners have, in recent years, adopted several alternative practices (Watsu for example). However, in most cases, at least officially, these non-traditional techniques and the philosophies behind them are adjusted to fit the stipulations of the clinical context which requires evidence-based therapy in order to be able to bill through Medicare in the US.
I suggest that quite often something is lost in that translation or adaptation. I would like to see more recognition by clinical and non-clinical practitioners alike of the nature of the significant differences between their practices. It is not always appropriate to assess the therapeutic value of alternative practices by scientific methods and certainly not reasonable to devalue or sideline them when they do not fit such methods.
One way to effectively demonstrate this would be for alternative aquatics practitioners to document their sessions and results more consistently than generally occurs. I invite your comments and your ideas for promoting the keeping and sharing of records of aquatic sessions, and eventually for furthering research into those aspects that do not fit the current scientific models.
If you are an alternative aquatics practitioner who already keeps records, I welcome your contact. If you are interested in keeping records, I would be glad to share with you a forthcoming basic documentation system that can be adapted to your particular setting and circumstances.
* By
Alternative Aquatics I mean any water-based healing modality that involves movement and/or bodywork but that is not considered suitable without significant modification for clinical settings or medical billing (see below for a list of factors related to this).
Read the full article here.
You need to be a member of AquaticNet Social Network to add comments!
Join this Ning Network